Music in the video (free, by me, licensed under CC-NC-SA if you'd like to use): [ Ссылка ]
Other photos (also CC-NC-SA): [ Ссылка ]
Instagram: [ Ссылка ]
The Contax T3 is one of the memeiest point-and-shoots around; is it any good? (Spoiler: yes, but it's not that much better than plenty of other options.)
T3 vs. Rollei 35se side-by-side comparisons: [ Ссылка ]
chapters:
0:00 intro and some pics
0:15 basic info
1:48 pluses
4:19 in the field with fuji c200
5:15 minuses
7:36 in the field with t-max 100 and portra 160
8:14 sharpness demos
8:42 comparisons
11:55 conclusions
12:41 outro and see you next time :)
---
quick tech specs for nerds:
contax t3
mostly at f/5.6-f/8
sharpness examples at 1/250s or faster
(no tripod because
IT'S A POINT AND SHOOT. sue me.)
all photos developed by photolab in berkeley, ca
b&w developed in xtol
scanned w/ fuji gfx 100 + 120/4 GF + extension tube
(film mounted in negative.supply setup)
at f/11 (film flatness is hard!)
(single image, not stitched,
effective resolution ~60 MP,
effective DPI 6000+)
(a.k.a. WAY overkill)
color inverted in NLP + LR to taste
B&W inverted by hand + LR to taste
there's no such thing as a neutral scan,
and this isn't a scientific review.
---
CC Images credits:
"Olympus Mju-II" by mmartinsson is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
"OLYMPUS μ[mju:]-II DELUXE" by d!zzy is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
"New Toy — Rollei 35 S" by Rsms (black rollei 35s)
[ Ссылка ]
rollei 35 s (in hand) by janne moren
[ Ссылка ]
"RICOH GR III" by HAMACHI! is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
