Second episode (Season 2) of a series of talks with the logician and philosopher Graham Priest (CUNY) about contradiction. Since the lier paradox made its first appearance in Ancient Greece, there have been countless attempts to solve it. In this episode Prof. Priest discusses some of them and explains why they fail. He concludes that we should take these paradoxes as evidence that some contradictions are true.
Very few philosophers dared to question the Principle of Non Contradiction, which says that contradictions cannot be true. The principle has gone so unquestioned that hardly any philosopher since Aristotle tried to defend it. Graham Priest belongs to the small number of philosophers who - in the good company of Heraclitus and Hegel - have dared to question it. He thinks that some contradictions are true. Here is why.
Discussant: Emiliano Boccardi
The Logical Paradoxes - Ep. 2.2: Solving the liar paradox
Теги
ContradictionParaconsistencyDialetheismGraham PriestLogicMathematicsFoundations of mathematicsPhilosophy of logicPrinciple of non contradictionAristotleNon classical logicsParadoxParaconsistent logicsHistory of logicPrinciple of explosionPrinciple of identityRationalityModern logicFregeRussellHistory of mathematicsHistory of philosophyParadoxo do mentirosoTeoria do conhecimentoFilosofiaVerdadeEmiliano BoccardiLogicaO que é