The requirement to show identification in order to vote has become a topic of heated debate in recent years. Proponents argue that voter ID laws protect our elections from fraud, while opponents say these laws disenfranchise some eligible voters. Professor Derek Muller of Pepperdine University’s Caruso School of Law and Professor Daniel P. Tokaji of The Ohio State University’s Michael E. Moritz College of Law present differing views on the pros and cons of voter ID laws.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Learn more about Professor Derek Muller:
[ Ссылка ]
Learn more about Professor Daniel Tokaji:
[ Ссылка ]
Related Links:
Voter ID: A Debate - Podcast
[ Ссылка ]
The Right to Vote in an Age of Discontent
[ Ссылка ]
What's Old is New Again: The Nineteenth Century Voter Registration Debates and Lessons About Voter Identification Disputes
[ Ссылка ]
Former United States Attorney General Meese on Voter ID Laws - Podcast
[ Ссылка ]
Differing Views:
"Voter Suppression" Is a Myth, but It's an Article of Faith to Liberals
[ Ссылка ]
ACLU: Fighting Voter Suppression
[ Ссылка ]
The New Voter Suppression
[ Ссылка ]
The Myth of Voter Fraud
[ Ссылка ]
How The Trump Admin’s Attempt To Perpetuate The Voter Fraud Myth Failed Miserably
[ Ссылка ]
