The case is about a challenge to the validity of the proration program for raisins under the California Agricultural Prorate Act. The appellee argued that the program violated the Commerce Clause and the Sherman Act. The district court allowed the appellee to market his crop under the protection of the court's decree. The relevant facts are that the prorate program is authorized by the state and is not organized by private individuals or corporations. The program restricts the sale of commodities within the state by its producer to a processor who intends to work on the commodity before packing and shipping it in interstate commerce.
Parker v. Brown (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States
317 U.S. 341, 87 L. Ed. 315, 63 S. Ct. 307, SCDB 1942-087, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1263
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
