What is up, my watch friends?!? So, check this out… Today, I want to talk about my ownership experience of the Grand Seiko SBGA387, aka “The Glacier.” I hope my fellow watch enthusiasts will appreciate hearing what it’s like to own this beautiful limited edition. After wearing this watch, despite its relatively high price tag, I’ve come to determine that Grand Seiko is the greatest value brand on the market today! But, what do you think? Is this watch worth the price tag?

If you have a question that I didn't cover in the video, please comment below and I'll try to respond as soon as I can.

Keep the insanity sane!

HELPFUL LINKS:
➡️ Grand Seiko [ Ссылка ]
➡️@the1916companywatchreviews Grand Seiko SBGA387 Review [ Ссылка ]

FOLLOW AT:
➡️ Instagram: [ Ссылка ]
➡️ Facebook: [ Ссылка ]

EMAIL:
horologyinsanity@gmail.com

AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION ON SPONSORED CONTENT AND PAID PROMOTION:
As always, this is not paid content. I refuse to let this channel be an extension of some company's marketing scheme. I receive zero compensation of any form to make these videos. Being a part of a Watch Tour or borrowing a watch from a friend in no way obligates me to make a video, nor to say one thing or another in any videos I do choose to make. If it did or was insinuated to be, I would not participate. Most everything you see on this channel, I personally paid for (and usually not at a discount, unless a sale was available to the entire public). In short, I am doing this channel because I want to include it within my watch hobby. I will continue to say anything I want on this channel, without bowing down to any shill editorial control. I do this under no other obligation or desire, other than to continue contributing back to the amazing enthusiasts that make this hobby so great!

FAIR USE NOTIFICATION AND DISCLAIMER:
This video may contain copyrighted material. The use of this material has not been specially authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purpose of criticism, comment, review, and/or news reporting, which constitute "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review, and/or news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

This video was created to abide by YouTube's Terms of Service. The purpose of this video is to discuss or critique the material included. The creator harbors no malicious intent. This video may contain jokes, satire, and negative criticism of other individuals and their ideas, or of companies/brands and their products, but it is intended as a platform to discuss or critique these things and does not constitute a personal attack or abuse of another individual, company, or brand.

While this video may contain material that some may perceive as "hurtful" or "negative," that is not the purpose of this video. This material is created for entertainment, comedic, satirical, or similarly enjoyable purposes that are not intended to cause offense or humiliation. Recordings in this video were made in accordance with the laws of the country in which the filming took place and were not created for malicious purposes.

свернуть