DETALII ⬇️⬇️

►Ne găsim și pe Instagram👉[ Ссылка ]
►Nu ai ce face cu banii? Devino membru👉 [ Ссылка ]
►Thumbnail realizat de 👉[ Ссылка ]
.......................................................................................................................
📝
Dobrincu in scandal cu Silviu Faiar, Mihai TPN si Paraschiv.

Sebastian Dobrincu este suparat pe haterii care vorbesc despre el in stream-uri si investigatii si a decis sa faca un exemplu din Mihai TPN, omul care a discutat despre el in seria Influenker Fun. Sebastian a decis ca e nevoie sa ia masuri drastice si sa dea in judecata atat pe Mihai cat si pe Silviu Faiar si Paraschiv, cei din urma doar urmarind materialul lui Mihai pe stream-urile lor.

Faiar a povestit ca Sebastian Dobrincu l-a mai contactat si in trecut pentru a-l da in judecata, fara succes, iar Paraschiv a dezvoltat putin investigatia si a gasit o noua platforma de la Sebastian care ar avea review-uri indoielnice.

Mihai TPN despre Sebastian Dobrincu: [ Ссылка ]
Paraschiv despre RevocalizeAI: [ Ссылка ]
Silviu Faiar reactioneaza la Mihai TPN: [ Ссылка ]
.......................................................................................................................

⏰MOMENTE⏰

0:00 DESPRE CINE E VORBA
5:42 CINE E SEBASTIAN DOBRINCU?
6:34 ARTICOLUL RECORDER
12:10 ADEVARUL
26:45 IMAGINEA DE SUCCES
36:42 PROBLEME LEGALE
37:30 CAN CAN vs STREAMERI
39:12 OPINIE PERSONALA

.......................................................................................................................

Legal disclaimers:

The European Court of Human Rights has emphasized in its jurisprudence that "given the significant role of the Internet in expanding public access to news and facilitating information sharing, the function of bloggers and influential social media users can be likened to that of 'public watchdogs'" (ECHR, CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY, 8th of November 2016, par. 168). In light of this, my online activity, including the content that I produce and share on this YouTube channel, can reasonably be considered journalistic in nature. My work serves a similar purpose to traditional journalism in informing the public and holding public figures accountable.

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use."
"No copyright infringement intended"
"I do not own the music"
"I don't take credit for music".
"Made for satirical purposes only, no copyright infringement intended"

In addition to YouTube policies, the Romanian legislation, journalistic investigation materials like this cannot be suspected of violating copyrights. Specifically, Article 7 of Law no. 190/2018 regarding measures for the implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) provides protection for materials of this kind, highlighting the importance of free expression and the right to information in our society.
Article 9 of Law 8/1996 on copyright and related rights stipulates that: "The following cannot benefit from legal copyright protection: e) news and press information" and Article 35 of Law no. 8/1996 provides that: "(2) Under the conditions provided in paragraph (1), reproduction, distribution, broadcasting or communication to the public is permitted, without direct or indirect commercial or economic advantage: a) of short excerpts from press articles and radio or television reports, for the purpose of informing on current issues, except for those for which such use is expressly reserved"

свернуть