This is a legal case about whether Cresmont Loft in Baltimore City should be allowed to operate as a 26-unit apartment building. The Petitioners challenged the construction permit and occupancy permit, arguing that the Board did not follow proper procedures and that the individual suites did not qualify as dwelling units because the tenants were not "families." The Court of Special Appeals reversed the Board's decision, stating that construction should have been halted when Petitioners filed their negative appeal to the Board. The Petitioners also complained about a fence erected by Cresmont restricting their access to an alley of common use and the location of a transformer on the Property violating the rear yard requirements of the Code. Cresmont argued that the project complied with the construction permit's allowance of twenty-six dwelling units and was in compliance with the Code provisions cited by Petitioners.

Armstrong v. Mayor of Baltimore (2009)
Court of Appeals of Maryland
410 Md. 426, 979 A.2d 98

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть