Atheist Armin Navabi tackles Matt Slick's version of the transcendental argument for God (TAG) in chapter 14 of his book, "Why There Is No God." TAG is an attempt to demonstrate the existence of God using the Laws of Logic. These laws would include the Law of Identity, the Law of Non-Contradiction, and the Law of Excluded Middle.

Armin believes that while the argument is structurally sound, it commits the fallacy of equivocation. He states, "The phenomena these laws refer to would continue to exist regardless of whether a deity or anyone else thought about them... Minds are necessary only to describe that phenomenon, not to make it true." Is TAG a good argument, or should it be discarded as a failed attempt to demonstrate that God exists? This will be the topic of today's show! As always, come join the show and bring your questions! Callers welcome at the end.

Matt Slick's version of the Transcendental Argument for God's Existence - [ Ссылка ]

Check out my playlist where I discuss all of the previous chapters! [ Ссылка ]

Ryan's Info
Website: [ Ссылка ]
Email Updates: [ Ссылка ]
Facebook: [ Ссылка ]
Instagram, Twitter, TikTok: @ryanpauly3
iTunes Podcast: [ Ссылка ]
Soundcloud: [ Ссылка ]
Spotify: [ Ссылка ]
Amazon Music: [ Ссылка ]
Speaking Requests: [ Ссылка ]

If you have received something of value from this ministry and want to give back, or if you want to partner in equipping the church for cultural engagement, would you prayerfully consider joining our financial support team? More information can be found here. [ Ссылка ]

свернуть