The case is about a holographic will which includes a clause to form a trust for rewarding anyone who finds a cure for rheumatoid arthritis to UCLA's Medical Board's satisfaction. The executor of the estate filed a petition for determining interests, and the court found that the clause does not qualify as a charitable trust and is not a valid private trust. The Attorney General has appealed, arguing that the beneficiary is a single person and thus relevant.

United California Bank v. Mosk (1964)
District Court of Appeal of the State of California
227 Cal. App. 2d 167

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть