Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,100 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks ► [ Ссылка ]
State v. Neff
A defendant commits burglary by unlawfully entering or remaining in a building with the intent to commit a crime. In State versus Neff, the court considered what kinds of buildings can be burglarized.
J.A. Trent lived in a home that was set back seventy five feet from a public road. Trent raised chickens, which he kept in a chicken house across the road. The chicken house was located at least one hundred feet away from Trent’s home. One night, the Neffs broke into Trent’s chicken house and stole his chickens.
The Neffs were convicted of burglary and appealed to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, arguing that the state’s burglary statute didn’t apply to unoccupied buildings that weren’t attached to a dwelling house.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: [ Ссылка ]
The Quimbee App features over 42,100 case briefs keyed to 988 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► [ Ссылка ]
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: [ Ссылка ]
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► [ Ссылка ]
Quimbee Case Brief App ► [ Ссылка ]
Facebook ► [ Ссылка ]
Twitter ► [ Ссылка ]
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
State v. Neff Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Теги
State v. Neffbriefsquimbeelaw casecase brief examplebrief casecase briefpress briefcase summarieslegal briefhow to brief a casecase brief templatelegal brief casehow to write a case brieflegal brief examplesample case briefcase brief formatexample of a brieflaw briefslegal brief definitionwhat is a brief in lawwhat is a case briefcourt briefbrief definition lawlegal brief templatefacts of the casecase summary example
