18 years after its publication, Dr. John Robson fact-checks the predictions in the Canadian government's 2001 pamphlet warning of increased pollution, falling St. Lawrence water levels, crop failure and other things that should have happened by now.
For a transcript of this video including links to some of the sources, please visit [ Ссылка ]
To support the Climate Discussion Nexus, subscribe to our YouTube channel ([ Ссылка ]) and our newsletter (at [ Ссылка ]), like us on Facebook ([ Ссылка ]), follow us on Twitter ([ Ссылка ]), and make a monthly or one-time pledge at [ Ссылка ]
0:00 - Introduction
0:14 - Importance of models and history of forecasting
0:49 - First test of old forecast - Government of Canada pamphlet from 2001
2:28 - Summertime weather highs in Toronto
3:00 - Air pollution trends
3:44 - BC sea level trends
4:40 - Crop yield trends
5:16 - Forest fire trends
5:42 - Water levels in the St Lawrence River
6:36 - Forecasting worse than random guessing
7:17 - Why take current forecasting on face value when past predictions were so wrong?
Canada's 2001 climate predictions. How did they do?
Теги
Climate changeGlobal warmingClimate Discussion NexusJohn RobsonCO2AGWDroughtSea levelsCrop failureCDNClimateDNIPCCGreta ThunbergExtreme weatherClimate denierclimate skepticRecord temperatureYAFBen ShapiroJoe RoganFox NewsVeritasiumMichael KnowlesMark SteynRush LimbaughNaomi SeibtHeartland InstituteEric WeinsteinHoover InstituteFraser InstituteRubin ReportLarry ElderCandace Owens