The case is about whether the exclusionary principle established in the Mapp v. Ohio ruling applies to state court convictions that had become final before the Mapp decision was rendered. In Mapp, the Supreme Court ruled that the exclusion of evidence obtained through illegal search and seizure, as required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, applies only to cases decided after the Mapp decision. The petitioner argues that his case should still be governed by Mapp because the search was conducted after the Mapp decision.
Linkletter v. Walker (1965)
Supreme Court of the United States
381 U.S. 618, 14 L. Ed. 2d 601, 85 S. Ct. 1731, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2283, SCDB 1964-123
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
