Why I Stopped Using Bluehost in 2024 - An Honest Review
Are you considering Bluehost for web hosting? As a former customer, I'm here to tell you: don't do it. Despite glowing recommendations from major publications, here's why Bluehost is the worst choice based on my research and experience.
Bluehost was once a good choice, but everything changed when EIG (now Newfold Digital) bought it. This corporation has a terrible reputation, controlling big names like HostGator and Web.com. Many reviewers promote Bluehost because they get the highest commissions, not because it's the best option.
In terms of performance, Bluehost fails in two key areas: Page Speed and Uptime. Ideal page load times are under 400ms, but Bluehost consistently falls short. Their uptime is the worst I've tested, meaning your site may often be inaccessible. Their customer support is also outsourced and unprofessional. In my experience, I received incorrect information from representatives who confused Bluehost with other companies.
Creating a website with Bluehost is easy thanks to their user-friendly interface and cPanel. However, the platform is laggy and sometimes freezes. Bluehost offers basic features like free SSL, CDN, and Yoast SEO. However, anything extra costs more, making it an expensive choice. With 1 in 4 customers giving the lowest rating, common complaints include poor support, slow speeds, and frequent downtime. Other companies offer better service at lower prices.
Despite its poor performance, Bluehost is one of the most expensive options. They charge extra for basics like domain names and WHOIS privacy, benefiting reviewers but not customers. Bluehost is not worth your time or money. For the best web hosting options, watch my full video guide. Save yourself hassle and money with honest reviews. Subscribe for more!
Tags: #BluehostReview #WebHosting #BluehostAlternatives #WebsitePerformance #CustomerSupport #WebHostingReview #HonestReview
