To some critics, nothing can negate the fact that the Gospels themselves don't say who wrote them. They're not like the letters of Paul where he introduces himself.
What's unusual about this is that the Gospels purport to be histories. Greek historians like Herodotus and Thucydides declare themselves as the writers of their works in their prefaces. Christian apologists categorize Luke as a historian. But Luke famously includes an introduction but doesn't mention his name. So what's going on here?
Source: The Alleged Anonymity of the Canonical Gospels, Simon Gathercole, [ Ссылка ]
Help support me: Patreon [ Ссылка ]. You can also do a one-time donation at paypal.me/isjesusalive
Join this channel to get access to perks:
[ Ссылка ]
Outro music:
Equinox by Purrple Cat | [ Ссылка ]
Music promoted by [ Ссылка ]
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
[ Ссылка ]
Missing Names Doesn't Mean the Gospels Are Anonymous
Теги
who wrote the gospelsare the gospels anonymousanonymous gospelsbart ehrman anonymous gospelswho wrote the gospels bart ehrmantestifyerik manningwho wrote matthew mark luke and johnpaulogia who wrote the biblematt dillahunty who wrote the biblematt dillahunty anonymous gospelswho wrote the new testament gospelssimon gathercole anonymous gospelsgospels are not anonymousauthorship of four gospelsauthors of four gospelsgospelschristian apologetics
