The case involves complaints against two defendants, C.E. Refractories and Bevco Industries, regarding asbestos. The first complaint was dismissed because it did not provide the state of incorporation or principal place of business of the defendants, which is required for jurisdictional purposes. The plaintiff was given a chance to amend the complaint, but the plaintiff's counsel did not comply and submitted the same deficient complaint with insulting language towards the judge. The court emphasized the importance of correctly pleading jurisdictional requirements and gave the plaintiff's counsel ample opportunity to correct the issue.
Randazzo v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. (1987)
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
117 F.R.D. 557
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
