The defendant is appealing a life imprisonment sentence for murder, claiming that the prosecutor improperly cross-examined defense witnesses, gave wrong instructions, and made improper arguments. The prosecutor asked about the defendant's past unrelated convictions, which the defendant claims were improper questions. The appeal court must analyze if the prosecutor's actions were improper and if they affected the trial's outcome.
Broyles v. Commonwealth (1954)
Kentucky Court of Appeals
267 S.W.2d 73
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
