A discussion of how systematic bias, publication bias, random error (a.k.a. statistically predictable error), and conflicts of interest result in most published research being wrong. Recommendations of how to improve the problem are also discussed.
Ending Medical Reversal ([ Ссылка ])
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False ([ Ссылка ])
Is Everything We Eat Associated With Cancer? ([ Ссылка ])
Translation of highly promising basic science research into clinical applications ([ Ссылка ])
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science ([ Ссылка ])
A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices ([ Ссылка ])
Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy ([ Ссылка ])
John Oliver / Last Week Tonight on Scientific Studies and p hacking ([ Ссылка ])
Derek Muller/ Veritasium on whether most published research is wrong ([ Ссылка ])
Seinfeld's Junior Mint episode ([ Ссылка ])
