Time Stamps:
0:00 What is evolutionary psychology?
2:34 EP has few clinical applications
3:33 The naturalistic fallacy
6:27 Support from bigoted circles
10:15 EP hyper-focuses on sex differences
12:40 These alleged sex differences are used to justify human rights violations
15:08 EP often gets used as manosphere ammunition
18:36 EP often ignores the role of social factors
23:12 We know very little about our ancestors
25:06 Just-so stories
26:40 Neural plasticity threatens the modularity hypothesis
27:35 The time machine argument: we cannot know these changes came from adaptation
28:40 EP is too predeterministic and reductionistic
29:45 Conclusions

References:

Cannito, & Ferrero Camoletto, R. (2022). The Rules of Attraction: An Empirical Critique of Pseudoscientific Theories about Sex in the Manosphere. Sexes, 3(4), 593–607. [ Ссылка ]

Van Valkenburgh. (2021). Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 24(1), 84–103. [ Ссылка ]

Petersen, & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A Meta-Analytic Review of Research on Gender Differences in Sexuality, 1993-2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21–38. [ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126. [ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]02077-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0169534700020772%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

[ Ссылка ]

свернуть