Why would Medea Benjamin appear in the small room of people in Washington DC recently to ask the first question in the Q and A (?) just after Marianne Williamson's speech on Economic Human Rights, and her plan to implement an "economic u-turn" in America IF she becomes Pres. in 2024.
Fisher reviews the up and down-side of the Marianne Williamson Phenomenon as it grows into a new 'phase' as he sees it with the recent speech in Washington, DC, the new masculine look, the reading of political script... these are all strategic new features that are showing a re-shaping of how Williamson is coming across as a political candidate and visionary leader. Fisher re-asserts that Williamson and her team have not yet understood how the use of "hate" and "fear" are still embedded in the discourse she uses at times, even paraphrasing FDR, and how she has to be aware of fearmongering in her own initiatives to become president. This can be changed with greater awareness. Activism typically moves in this direction when the stakes get high and the lust to 'win' takes over. Activism moves into intimidation as a moral virtue with the enemy held at bay--this is what Williamson is doing with the corporate elite.
