Adam Smith, sometimes considered the founding father of capitalism, offered a 'thin' conception of justice — primarily protection from injury from others. Many critics, however, believe that justice should encompass much more, including positive duties to help those in need. Are there any good reasons to support a Smithian 'thin' conception of justice? Can a system of political economy based on such a conception be considered moral? In other words, do markets and morality mix?
Still haven’t subscribed to The Heritage Foundation on YouTube? Click here ► [ Ссылка ]
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Facebook: [ Ссылка ]
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Twitter: [ Ссылка ]
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Instagram: [ Ссылка ]
Justice vs. Social Justice
Теги
JusticeSocial JusticeAdam SmithJames OttesonHeritage Foundationblmblack lives mattergeorge floydsocialismchopchazcapitol hill autonomous zonecapitol hill occupying protestthe heritage foundationcapitalismcapitalistsocial justicejusticedonald trumpconservativenancy pelosiAOCAlexandria Ocasio-Cortezthe daily signal
