Why Milton Friedman Supported Guaranteed Income | 5 Reasons
Milton Friedman supported a guaranteed minimum income with a Negative Income Tax (NIT). While NIT and Universal Basic Income (UBI) are both guaranteed minimum incomes, the difference is a UBI goes to everyone automatically, while a NIT is distributed based on income. That's why I made sure to refer to Friedman's NIT as a guaranteed income rather than UBI. Even though they are very similar and the arguments for universal basic income and negative income tax are nearly the same.
Transcript: [ Ссылка ]
"Suppose one accepts, as I do, this line of reasoning as justifying governmental action to alleviate poverty; to set, as it were, a floor under the standard of life of every person in the community." - Milton Friedman
"Poverty: A Direct Approach" (1964)
[ Ссылка ]
Matt Orfalea
▶[ Ссылка ]
▶[ Ссылка ]
▶[ Ссылка ]
▶[ Ссылка ]
Subscribe ▶[ Ссылка ]
Support my work ▶[ Ссылка ]
