Support the Channel:
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]

All Social Links: [ Ссылка ]

The popular political refrain stating that the US Civil War was fought primarily to end slavery is absurd and a dangerous example of historical revisionism made to promote a contemporary political agenda.

In this video, I've gone through some of the hard factors which motivated this largely economic war.

If there were a country, we'll call it country A, which made the majority of its income by selling oil, and another country, country B, began imposing sanctions on country A which hurt it economically, would a war declared on country B by country A be considered to be "about" oil? What if country A had no intention of disrupting the oil production of country A at all?

YouTube: [ Ссылка ]
Bitchute: [ Ссылка ]
Odysee: [ Ссылка ]
Twitter: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть