A little bit of a lower quality video this time, with some intresting content.

Dyno curve comparison:

So, the ktm did have one and a half more peak horsepower, than the husqvarna, as expected, although the husqvarna did have higher peak torque, also expected. Looking at the curves placed ontop of eachother, you can see that the peak power of the husqvarna is spread out on a wider rpm range, while the ktms peak power is spread on a very small spot on the power curve, which while driving isn't very good. The husqvarnas power curve is in conclusion a much better curve, doesn't matter if you ride on a straight line or on a curvy road. Acceleration differences between the husqvarna and ktm is all up to the riders and riding style, and ofcourse weight. The power the dyno shows is rear wheel horsepower, which is about 10% roughly less than the crank horsepower, which would make the engines horsepower about 32HP.

Specs of the bike:
- UMA-Racing 65mm High-Comp cylinder kit
- UMA-Racing SuperHead PRO (22/25) (modified)
-UMA Racing bore-up connecting rod
- UMA Racing high-flow oil pump
- PWK 34mm carburetor
- DOMA Racing full exhaust (for crf250)
- Separate ECU with quickshifter and adjustable timing curve (12300rpm)
- FIM Lambda

The bike has now been sold to a new owner. Tribute coming soon ;)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Social media:
Instagram @_oskar_jansson @hussekillerhusse


Gear i use:
Sony a6300
Sony 18-105 f/4
Sigma 30mm f/1.4
Gopro hero 5 black edition
Adobe Premiere Pro / After effects

Kaikki videot kuvattu suljetulla alueilla, ja pitkän prosessin aikana editoitu näyttämään realistiselta Adobe After Effectsin avulla.

свернуть