Michael Krepon, Co-Founder of the Stimson Center, argues that states engaged in deterrence postures reassure their adversaries on their commitment to strategic stability through arms control, diplomacy, and confidence-building measures (CBMs), but caveats these initiatives as necessary, but insufficient, measures to prevent nuclear war.
This video is from Chapter 5.2 in Strategic Learning’s Deterrence in Southern Asia. For more videos and resources, sign up for the FREE online course at www.stratlearning.org.
***
Deterrence in Southern Asia is an online course produced by the Stimson Center South Asia Program's Strategic Learning initiative. Deterrence in Southern Asia goes beyond the India-Pakistan dyad to study deterrence relationships in the context of a larger strategic chain that includes China and the United States. It covers deterrence theory, deterrence relationships among nuclear-armed states, and case studies from the Cold War and Southern Asia through video interviews with more than 60 leading scholars and practitioners from India, Pakistan, China, the United States, and beyond.
***
Join your fellow Strategic Learners across social media and stay in the know on course content, video lectures, and new developments about our initiatives!
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
***
Disclaimer: Expert contributions reflect subjective views and interpretations of events, many of which are debated. Strategic Learning’s intention is to provide an analytical toolkit for further study of these complex issues, and we encourage you to use what you learn in this video to come to your own conclusions.
