This case is about a real estate developer and mortgage banker who allowed multifamily developers to obtain single-family mortgage insurance from the government. When the developer defaulted, the government paid over $6.6 million in insurance claims. The question is whether the court can require the developer to go through administrative appeals before filing a lawsuit, even if the government or law does not require it. The most relevant facts are the developer's default, the government's payment, and the dispute over the exhaustion of administrative remedies.
Darby v. Cisneros (1993)
Supreme Court of the United States
509 U.S. 137, 125 L. Ed. 2d 113, 113 S. Ct. 2539, SCDB 1992-102, 1993 U.S. LEXIS 4246
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
