The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) sued attorney Chance Gordon for violating the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA) and Regulation O. Gordon offered home loan modification services for a flat fee, which the CFPB found to be deceptive. The court affirmed Gordon's violation of CFPA but vacated and remanded part of the monetary judgment. Gordon argued against the CFPB's authority, claiming Cordray's appointment was unconstitutional.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Gordon (2016)
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
819 F.3d 1179

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть