The requirements are truly short and straight: evaluate customer specific requirements and implement them into quality management system. Even though this clause is not that easy and year by year there is an increase in nonconformities raised toward this clause.
The starting point for the organizations is to answer to the question who my automotive customers are and did any of these automotive customers created additional requirement or interpret it differently any requirement in IATF 16949. If the answer is yes, how do we capture these requirements from the customer, how do you review this requirements from the customer and how we will ensure that this requirements are implemented within relevant quality management system process. Going further, how in our audit system we will ensure that we will verify customer specific requirements.
If we are suppliers having few OEM's who issued customer specific requirements this task is massive to assure implementation of all customer specific requirements. CSR matrix might be helpful to manage CRS.
Since customer specific requirements are strongly incorporated almost in every close of IATF 16949 these requirements become among Top 10 probably because of repetitive disability of the system to fulfill customer specific requirements as this is very complex area.
The final thing is that the organisation should not only pull over what is given by the customers in CRS. CRS should be discussed with the customer during contract review because there could be serious cost implication in meeting customer specific requirements.
𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐐𝐔𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐘𝐖𝐈𝐒𝐄 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬, 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞: ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
𝐡𝐭𝐭𝐩𝐬://𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐞.𝐩𝐥/𝐞𝐧/
𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥!
Ещё видео!