Todd Linson was convicted of possessing five images of child pornography found on his computer. He appealed his conviction on the grounds of insufficient evidence, unconstitutional statute, and double jeopardy violation. The court reviewed the evidence and rejected Linson's claims. The most relevant facts are that cached images found on Linson's computer were used as evidence of his possession and that he had intentionally searched for and accessed child pornography on his computer.
State v. Linson (2017)
South Dakota Supreme Court
896 N.W.2d 656, 2017 SD 31
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
