Mrs. Wallace fell in a Wal-Mart store and was injured. She alleged she stepped on a grape and that Wal-Mart knew or should have known of the hazard. Wal-Mart moved for summary judgment, arguing there was no evidence to support the plaintiffs' claim. The court agreed and granted Wal-Mart's motion for summary judgment. The most relevant fact to the court's analysis is Wal-Mart's knowledge of the hazard.
Wallace v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2005)
Court of Appeals of Georgia
272 Ga. App. 343, 612 S.E.2d 528
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
