This is a direct comparison between the 1992 Director's Cut of Ridley Scott's #BladeRunner and the remastered 2007 Final Cut of the film. It should give you a better idea of what exactly was changed, which was more than just the colour grade. Personally, I think the Final Cut is still the definitive version, but some of the colours in certain scenes look, to my eyes, much nicer in the Director's Cut. Mainly all the neon and street scenes.
Please take into account the effect YouTube's encoding has on the quality of the footage. This isn't true 1:1 blu-ray quality (though that is what I used while editing) but it still shows the differences pretty well.
▶️[ Ссылка ]
▶️Twitter: [ Ссылка ]
▶️Instagram: [ Ссылка ]
Blade Runner is a 1982 science-fiction noir film starring Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, and Sean Young, based on the novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" by Philip K. Dick, Directed by Sir Ridley Scott with cinematography by Jorden Cronenweth, ASC.
A cult classic that is now widely regarded as one of the greatest sci-fi films of all time, Blade Runner has gone on to inform and influence countless films, television, and music in the decades since its release and is considered one of the pioneering works of the cyberpunk genre. Notorious for its troubled production as documented in the film "Dangerous Days: Making Blade Runner", the film suffered from studio meddling and is known to exist in at least seven different versions. The Director's Cut (1992) represents Ridley Scott's original and complete vision for the film, and the Final Cut (2007) is a remastering of that version that is generally accepted as the definitive cut. This video is a comparison of the two to highlight the differences in colour grade, effects shots, and digitally added or removed elements.
