Does a high-tech video laryngoscope outperform the traditional direct laryngoscope in tracheal intubation? We unpack the results from a multisite research study, revealing which method proves to be more effective in critical care situations.
🎙️ State of Health Podcast: [ Ссылка ]
Prior Episodes:
Tranexamic Acid - [ Ссылка ]
The Magic Pacemaker - [ Ссылка ]
DISCLAIMER
⚠️ For Healthcare Practitioners: This content is provided only for medical education. Although the authors have made every effort to provide the most up-to-date, evidence-based medical information, this content should not necessarily be considered the standard of care. It may not reflect individual practices in other geographic locations. It should be considered in the context of other medical educational resources.
⚠️ For the Public: This content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. You should contact your own physician or other qualified healthcare providers with any questions you may have regarding your medical condition. Do not disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it based on information from this content. Relying on information provided in this content is done at your own risk. In a medical emergency, contact your physician or call 9-1-1 immediately.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
[ Ссылка ]
Video vs Direct Laryngoscopy in Critically Ill Patients
Теги
video laryngoscopydirect laryngoscopytracheal intubationcritically ill adultsemergency departmentintensive care unitmulticenter trialrandomized trialsuccessful intubationfirst attemptsevere complicationshypoxemiahypotensionvasopressor usecardiac arrestdeathefficacyinterim analysisemergency medicine residentcritical care fellowrisk differenceconfidence intervalsafety outcomesesophageal intubationteeth injuryaspiration