I compare X-Trans sensor with Bayer filter sensor to see which one is better at the JPEG level. I'm comparing color rendering and dynamic range to see if there are any differences between the two sensors. Here I'm not investigating the photos at pixel level because the X-A1 has the anti-aliasing filter and the X-E2 has not. Also, I'm not doing in depth analysis of the raw files because raw file software tools handle the two file formats differently. (For practical purposes both of the raw files give you very comparable amount of flexibility.)
I'm using Fujifilm X-A1 and Fujifilm X-E2, both with Fujinon 18-55 mm zoom lens for my experiments. I photograph the same scenes with both cameras and then compare the images. My main conclusion is that I don't see differences (at the level of color or dynamic range) between X-Trans and Bayer filter when they are inside Fuji cameras. Fujifilm makes them work exactly the same way as far as I can tell. The X-Trans and Bayer filter sensors produced photos with quality that was indistinguishable to the naked eye.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** If you like this video, please consider SUBSCRIBING to my channel
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINKS:
Review of Fujifilm X-A1: [ Ссылка ]
Review of Fujifilm X-E2: [ Ссылка ]
Review of Fujinon XF 18-55mm zoom lens: [ Ссылка ]
Quick RawTherapee tutorial: [ Ссылка ]
Fujifilm X-A1 sample photos: [ Ссылка ]
Fujifilm X-E2 sample photos: [ Ссылка ]
PR_51
