Defendant Mills is a telemarketer who called Plaintiff Schreiber. After the call, Schreiber wrote a letter to Mills asking to be removed from any list and not contacted again. The letter stated that Schreiber would consider any subsequent calls acceptance of an offer to contract for Schreiber’s "listening services" at a stipulated rate. Mills never replied to the letter but called Schreiber twice more. Schreiber sued for the price of their "listening services." The trial court granted Mills' motion to dismiss. Schreiber appealed.

S. Allen Schreiber v. Olan Mills (1993)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
627 A.2d 806, 426 Pa. Super. 537, 627 A.2d 806

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть