This case involves a dispute over a private agreement that prohibits non-Caucasian individuals from owning or occupying property in certain areas. The Supreme Court is considering whether state courts' enforcement of these agreements violates the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. The relevant facts include the private agreement's language, the lower court's decision to grant relief to the respondents, and the Supreme Court's prior rulings on discriminatory property laws and state action.

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)
Supreme Court of the United States
334 U.S. 1, 92 L. Ed. 2d 1161, 68 S. Ct. 836, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2764, SCDB 1947-072

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть