The introduction of MIRV led to a major change in the strategic balance. Previously, with one warhead per missile, it was conceivable that one could build a defence that used missiles to attack individual warheads. Any increase in missile fleet by the enemy could be countered by a similar increase in interceptors. With MIRV, a single new enemy missile meant that multiple interceptors would have to be built, meaning that it was much less expensive to increase the attack than the defence. This cost-exchange ratio was so heavily biased towards the attacker that the concept of mutual assured destruction became the leading concept in strategic planning and ABM systems were severely limited in the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in order to avoid a massive arms race.
"FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER"
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
The 10 Missiles That Can Carry Most Nuclear Warheads
Теги
The 10 Missiles That Can Carry Most Nuclear Warheadsmost MIRV missilebiggest missile in the worldlist of active icbmlist of MIRV capable missiletop 10 ICBMtop 10 missilestop 10 longest range missilerussian icbm vs usUS icbmIndian ICBMFrench ICBMrs 28 sarmatupcoming ICBM in the worldbulava missiledf-41 missiledf-5c missilelayner icbmm-51 missilefastest missile in the worldslbm missile launch